Week 5 â€Finances Essay Example for Free

Week 5 Finances EssayDebate on net income maximization ethics and corporate complaisant responsibilityTraditionally, the art of participations direction is to change the financial welf be of the shareholders of the company by maximum of lucre provided it is under the law. This is the canonical law and stinting science account (Elhauge 2004)Companies are consequently liable for any act(s) that causes much that usual harm under an self-sufficient law. However if the operations do not cause any undesired effect, then, it is socially acceptable that the company maximises profits. The management of companies is therefore required to consider the interests of other stakeholders in their daily operations.This is as a direct of the law that was enacted at the height of corporate takeovers during the 1980s. This law could however be construed to mean that the management of corporations barely consider the interests of others only if doing so enhances the companys profits.Sha reholders and management have no legal duty to maximize profit although they have a legal discretion to forego on profits in the public interest. (Elhauge 2004) According to Manuel Costello Branco and Lucia Lima Rodriquez companies only engage in corporate social responsibility if they are set to gain from such an undertaking. (Brancho Rodriguez 2007) incarnate social responsibility may include environmental protection, human race resource management, health and safety at work, relation with community and with suppliers and customers. (Branco Rodriguez 2007) CSR boarders on ethics and management should therefore consider the dissembles of their activities on the various stakeholders. It is also considered to be a emulation dodging which can impart a company competitive advantage. (Branco Rodriguez 2007)This debate on CSR is on shareholders-stakeholders point of view where shareholders view is that management should maximize their wealth while the stakeholders view is towards all stakeholders (Friedman 1998, Jensen 2001)The classical view of championship encompasses purely economic basis and constrained profit making views. This is the shareholders view. The stakeholders view on the other hand is of socially sure business where corporations are sensitive to needs if other stakeholders (Lantos 2001)Companies should therefore, not ignore the interests of other stakeholders if doing so could impact negatively on the companys intention of maximizing shareholders wealth. (Stern berg 1997, Jensen 2001) Ethics basically is what constitutes right-hand(a) or wrong behavior in business in terms of operations and situations happening in companies.In the daily operations of companies legion(predicate) unethical actions and decisions are made. Corporate citizenship concept is propagated by the corporation where businesses promote goals that they view as important while at the same time solving social problems thus rejecting the idea of profit maximization and l aw compliance.The results of an activity rather than the activity itself are what determine whether an action is ethical or not. Clarkson further elaborates that an actions is goodly right if it generates the greatest amount of good to many a(prenominal) people. (utilitarian theory) (Clarkson 1995)It is evident therefore that the concept of ethics is controversial in the sense that there are self-contradictory positions as to what constitutes what is morally right or wrong as shown by Kantian ethics and Utilitarian ethics. (Hymson 2007) In business ethics, because of competition, actions of one company e.g. adoption of lower prices brings to the other companies adopting the same pricing strategy and hence business ethics tend to be uniform (Hymson 2007)Monopolistic businesses where there is no competition can elect to apply personal ethics. But the cost of following personal ethics is borne by the employees. Hence argument gives credence to the idea that businesses only social responsibility is t maximize profits (Friedman 1998).Outside business ethics, CSR is usually all about making profits.Government regulationsThe politics should take channelise and ensure that companies do not undertake business practice that cause undesirable effects on the community and therefore it should pass laws and regulations that guide corporations in the business practice (Reich 2007).The stiff competition that many corporations in the world today face makes them focus more on ways of making more profits and therefore the need of government regulations to protect the environment, consumers and even the employees.Robert Reich further alludes to the fact that corporations cannot be moral or immoral and can only be responsible if publicly held by their shareholders. The shareholders interest is to maximize their profits and therefore companies should do public good in their quest to maximize their profits (Reich 2007)Reasons for government regulationsAn example of company th at could justify the government regulations is Wal-Mart. This corporation on one hand spends money on CSR projects but on the other it is against employees union, pays low remunerations with minimum benefits. The company also is against living wage initiatives. Wal-Mart has also been accused of forcing employees to perform overtime duties, sex and race discrimination and a whole masses of other things. The World com and Enron scandals are other examples that call for government regulations on CSR and business ethics. The list is endless, Adelphi, Tyco, computing device associates. All these cases touch on the subject of business ethics. Business ethics violations can also lead to illegalities as exemplified by the Enron and World com cases (Hymson 2007)ReferencesHymson, E.B (2007) Law The force that harmonizes business ethics with profit maximization. Retrieved on 4/3/2008 from http//www.salsb.org/slj/vol-xv/14hymson.pdfElhauge, E. (2004) Sacrificing corporate profits in the publ ic interest. Retrieved on 4/3/08 from http//www.law.harvard.edu/programs/olin_center/corporate_governance/papers/04.Elhauge.sacrificing-corporate-profits.pdf.Branco, M.C and Rodriguez L. L (2007). Positioning stakeholders theory within the debate on corporate social responsibility (Vol 12. No. 1). Retrieved on 4/3/2008 fromhttp//www.salsb.org/slj/vol-xv/14hymson.pdfFriedman. (1998), The social responsibility of business is to increaseits profits, in Pincus, L.B. (Ed.), Perspectives in business ethics,McGraw-Hill, SingaporeJensen, M.C. (2001) Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, andthe Corporate Objective Function, Journal of Applied CorporateFinance, Vol.14 No.3Sternberg. (1997) The Defects of Stakeholder Theory, CorporateGovernance, Vol 5 No.1.Lantos, G.P. (2001) The boundaries of strategic corporate socialresponsibility, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol.18 No.7Clarkson, M.B.E. (1995) A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzingand Evaluating Corporate cordial Performance, Academy o fManagement Review, Vol.20 No.1Robert Reich, R (2007). Super capitalism. The Transformation of Business, Democracy and Everyday Life.